Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)

Hi!

Isaac Penzev <isaacp@...> writes:
> > Isaac Penzev writes:
> > > ... µ for [N] - translit is mine) ...
> >
> > Would that generally be understood?
>
> I think no. I used µ as a simulation of eng character. ...
I think it's still much better than |m| or |ñ|, which both seem
misleading.  I seem to have overseen this fourth nasal character in
isolatin! :-) Very nice.

I thing I will experiment with this for Qthen|gai romanisation.  It's
currently a bit uneven.

Any good suggestion for a voiceless pharyngeal fricative? :-)
Currently, I use |hh|, the only digraph[1].  I thought about y with
diaeresis, maybe.

**Henrik

[1] Unless you analyse [nd], written |nd| as /d/, which would be
    feasible.

Replies