> Ed Heil wrote:
>
> > This reminds me of an experience I had today.
> >
> > I decided to see what "alt.language.artificial" was like. I started
> > reading at a randomly chosen point. The first message was a general
> > question about conlangs. The second message was a reply saying,
> > "don't write your messages in HTML, idiot." The third was a response
> > from the original poster containing obscenities.
> >
> > I decided I liked CONLANG much better.
>
> Though I fully understand your complaint (sci.lang seems always
> to be like that), that hasn't really been my experience of
> alt.language.artificial
> There, arguments seem more often than not to be the product of
> dogmatism on the part of auxlangers, not conlangers in general.
>
> =======================================================
> Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
> ICQ#: 4315704 AIM: Deuterotom
> Website: <
http://www.angelfire.com/tx/eclectorium/>
> "Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."
>
> Denn wo Begriffe fehlen,
> Da stellt ein Wort zur rechten Zeit sich ein.
> -- Mephistopheles, in Goethe's _Faust_
> ========================================================
>