Re: Survey(?) of ConLangs' Calendars and Colors and Kinterms
From: | caotope <johnvertical@...> |
Date: | Friday, October 21, 2005, 9:48 |
Tom Chappell wrote:
> What set of monomorphemic color terms does your conlang and/or
conculture include?
I am contemplating a system of the following kind:
*3 basic "hueless" colors (^= black, gray, white)
*7 basic "primary hued" colors (^= red, orange, yellow, green,
turquose, blue, purple)
*7 basic "intermediate hued" colors (^= tangerine, gold, lime, **,
azure, indigo, magenta)
*7 basic "pastel" colors (^=maroon, brown, beige, **, teal, **, lilac)
altho some of these may end up non-monomorphemic. I'm particularily
sceptic of "lime", "gold", "indigo", "pastel-green" and "pastel-blue"
The difference between all the hued colors is more varied than may
seem, however. For example, the difference between "yellow" and "gold"
(or "beige" and "brown") is that of lightness/darkness at least as
much as it is that of hue. Some other similar pairs include
azure&blue; lilac&indigo; and greenish-turquose&teal.
("^=" is used for the "corresponds" symbol. ** do not have good
English translations available, at least ones I'd know of.)
No decided kinterm system yet. Calendar will likely be the Roman
calendar (since this is a personal rather than concultural artlang)
John Vertical
Reply