Re: Tentative Judajca =A= Conjugations
From: | jesse stephen bangs <jaspax@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 23:07 |
Steg Belsky sikayal:
> [snip]
> > >Almost... it's infinitive + i:re.
>
> > Instead of the supine + ire found in written Latin?
> -
> How does that work? From putting together the definition of "supine" in
> my English dictionary and the verb charts in my Latin-English dictionary,
> it looks like the supine means "(having been) verbed"... how would that +
> i:re come up with an active "going to verb" concept?
Actually, the Romance forms came from infinitive + habe:re, using the
reduced forms of habe:re that Vulgar Latin had. In Spanish, for example,
you get hablar + hé > hablaré; similar things for the other Romance langs.
I beleive that the construction verb + habere originally meant "to have to
do something", which then came to indicate the future.
The Romance conditional came from the infinitive + imperfect of habere,
which has interesting semantic grounds.
Romanian is of course an exception to both of these.
Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu
"It is of the new things that men tire--of fashions and proposals and
improvements and change. It is the old things that startle and
intoxicate. It is the old things that are young."
-G.K. Chesterton _The Napoleon of Notting Hill_
Conlanger code: CLI> l%p+++ cS:R:N:H a++ y n18d:6 X+++ A-- E-- L-- N2.5
Idmp k++ ia-- p+ m++ o+++ P d++ b++ Yivríndil
Reply