Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Tentative Judajca =A= Conjugations

From:jesse stephen bangs <jaspax@...>
Date:Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 23:07
Steg Belsky sikayal:

> [snip] > > >Almost... it's infinitive + i:re. > > > Instead of the supine + ire found in written Latin? > - > How does that work? From putting together the definition of "supine" in > my English dictionary and the verb charts in my Latin-English dictionary, > it looks like the supine means "(having been) verbed"... how would that + > i:re come up with an active "going to verb" concept?
Actually, the Romance forms came from infinitive + habe:re, using the reduced forms of habe:re that Vulgar Latin had. In Spanish, for example, you get hablar + hé > hablaré; similar things for the other Romance langs. I beleive that the construction verb + habere originally meant "to have to do something", which then came to indicate the future. The Romance conditional came from the infinitive + imperfect of habere, which has interesting semantic grounds. Romanian is of course an exception to both of these. Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu "It is of the new things that men tire--of fashions and proposals and improvements and change. It is the old things that startle and intoxicate. It is the old things that are young." -G.K. Chesterton _The Napoleon of Notting Hill_ Conlanger code: CLI> l%p+++ cS:R:N:H a++ y n18d:6 X+++ A-- E-- L-- N2.5 Idmp k++ ia-- p+ m++ o+++ P d++ b++ Yivríndil

Reply

Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...>