Re: Droppin' D's Revisited
From: | Adrian Morgan <morg0072@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 0:46 |
Christophe Grandsire wrote, quoting Barry Garcia:
> > With long simple vowels, are they just pronounced the same as the
> > short ones, but drawn out longer? I'm always confused as to long and
> > short vowels, because what I gather from English, it's not really the
> > same
>
> Modern English doesn't really have an opposition between short and long
> vowels, but between lax vowels, tense vowels and diphtongs. But it's
> called short and long vowels for historical reasons.
It's true that /i/ tends to be thought of as 'short' while /I/
tends to be thought of as 'long'. This is because occurences of /I/ in
many dialects of English _are_ almost always longer than occurences of
/i/.
bit [bit]
beat [bI:t]
But what of the opposition between /a/ and /a:/? In my (Australian)
dialect, I don't believe there is any difference apart from length.
father [fa:D@] Bart [ba:t] farm [fa:m]
mother [maD@] but [bat] fun [fan]
In my dialect the word 'gone' is the only word in the language to
contain a phoneme that appears to be /O:/. There *may* be a very subtle
voice difference, but I cannot convince myself of it.
gone [gO:n] -- no other word contains [O:]
--
web. | Here and there I like to preserve a few islands of sanity
netyp.com/ | within the vast sea of absurdity which is my mind.
member/ | After all, you can't survive as an eight foot tall
dragon | flesh eating dragon if you've got no concept of reality.