Re: OT: art and language and THE DAVINCI CODE
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 0:53 |
michael poxon wrote at 2003-06-03 12:08:10 (+0100)
> I watched The Matrix a couple of weeks ago on the TV. It was
> followed by a much less well-known film called something like
> "White Squall" about a group of teenage boys on a sailing ship (one
> of those 'go in boys, come out men' plots). I watched this largely
> because of the presence of Jeff Bridges who has become one of my
> fave actors ever since the brilliant 'Starman'. No flashy special
> effects, no martial arts - and I know which of these two films I
> would pay to watch. Mike
>
But you are a thinking person, and _White Squall_ is neither
science-fiction nor a blockbuster action film, so it could never
qualify for either category. I don't think anyone here will disagree
with the proposition that there are better films than _The Matrix_.
> > > I don't agree to that. It's certainly not "The thinking
> > > person's science fiction movie", but it does contain a lot of
> > > references to various questions of philosophy. Maybe "The
> > > not-particularly-thinking person who would nonetheless enjoy a
> > > palatable introduction to certain deep thoughts's blockbuster
> > > action movie".
Reply