Re: OT: art and language and THE DAVINCI CODE
From: | David Starner <dvdeug@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, June 3, 2003, 20:19 |
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:54:52PM -0400, Sally Caves wrote:
> I wonder if spelling abominable "abhominable" is as abhorrent as misusing
> "lay." :) Probably, especially if one is complaining about writing.
It's not entirely wrong:
Abhominable \Ab*hom"i*na*ble\, a.
Abominable.
Note: [A false orthography anciently used; h was foisted into
various words; hence abholish, for abolish, etc.]
[1913 Webster]
This is abhominable, which he [Don Armado] would
call abominable. --Shak. Love's
Labor's Lost,
v. 1.
[1913 Webster]
--
David Starner - dvdeug@email.ro
Ic sæt me on anum leahtrice, ða com heo and bát me!