Re: another silly phonology question

On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Nik Taylor wrote:

> Yoon Ha Lee wrote:
> > No, I think it was specifically discussed when I asked about
> > Chevraqis having [b]  [t] [d]  [k] with no [p] or [g].
>
> Interesting, so you intuitively ended up dropping just those sounds that
> are most likely to be dropped if any stops are dropped?
<rueful g>  I don't know if it was even intuitive.  I just didn't like
the way [p] and [g] sounded!  Aesthetic intuition?  Beats me.  :-p

YHL