Re: OT: Mismatched phonologies / accents
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Thursday, January 24, 2008, 16:38 |
Peter Collier skrev:
> Appologies to those of you who will get two copies of
> this message.
>
> I have the following initial phoneme inventory for
> consonants:
>
> / p t k /
> / p\ B T D x G /
> / s z /
> / m n /
> / w l j /
> / r /
>
> I need to try and hammer a Gallo-Romance based
> language into that shape, and there are a few Romance
> phonemes I'm struggling to fit.
>
> If a speaker only has the above phonemes readily
> available, do you think the following approximate
> pronunciations are likely?
>
> /S/ > /T/
> /Z/ > /D/
> /ts/ > /s/
> /dz/ > /z/
> /tS/ > /x/
> /dZ/ > /G/
>
> Or do you think any of the sounds might be distinctive
> enough to the speakers's ears, and easy enough to
> accurately 'mimic', that a couple of new phonemes
> might be added to the inventory (e.g. /S/, /Z/)?
>
> Any thoughts/alternative suggestions greatly received!
If the language having the inventory is some kind of pre-
Old High German I'd expect /s/ to be apical [s_a] (like
in modern Spanish and Greek), and /z/ not to exist[^1]
and thus:
/ts/ > /T/
/dz/ > /D/
/S/ > /x/
/Z/ > /j/ or /G/
/tS/ > /S/ > /x/ or > /tj/ > /tt/ (/t/ word initially)
/dZ/ > /Z/ > /j/ or /G/ or /dj/ > /dd/d/
BTW I'd expect Latin /k/ before /e, i/ to become /ts/dz/
so that /tS/ would rarely arise -- perhaps only from /kj/,
and I do regard /j/ as the most likely outcome of both
/Z/ and /dZ/. Some think VL /g;/ actually first went to
/j/ everywhere!
/BP 8^)>
--
Benct Philip Jonsson -- melroch atte melroch dotte se
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"C'est en vain que nos Josués littéraires crient
à la langue de s'arrêter; les langues ni le soleil
ne s'arrêtent plus. Le jour où elles se *fixent*,
c'est qu'elles meurent." (Victor Hugo)
Reply