Re: Something interesting about us, perhaps

Nihil Sum sekalge:
> Jarhon cemuie mu vanimaram z'e.
> I completely do not understand this question.
You could say something in English, but it seems better to me if I put
certain things into Sturnan to say them (and provide a translation, of
course). Formal things seem more personal, then. I guess it's because
constructed languages are so often personal, despite the availability of
information on some, and using one's conlang is revealing a part of one's
private world to someone else.

I've got psycholology. Oyah.

Jan, a meisken 'i kedhai, sekalge:
>I think Chris referred to a joke in another thread, that if
non-conlangers were
>to be expelled from the list, John Cowan would be the first candidate
for that.

Really? I didn't notice. I've a mind like a thingie these days. You know.
You pour things through it.

>The way you (Chris) formulate your question gives the impression that
you do
>use your languages for shameful purposes ;)
I didn't notice that either. Perhaps you read a different question?

>Laimes,
>Jan
Meisken 'i kedhai.

Laimes,
Wright.

____
"Through not observing the thoughts of another a man is seldom unhappy,
but he who does not observe the movements of his own mind must of
necessity be unhappy."
--Marcus Aurelius

Reply