Re: tense marking and typology
From: | Tom Wier <artabanos@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 10, 1999, 0:59 |
Nik Taylor wrote:
> Well, _tense_ is, by definition, time, but not all languages have
> tense. A number of languages merely indicate aspect (e.g., perfect,
> progressive, habitual, etc.). However, the European three-time is not
> the only system. A number of language have past and non-past, for
> instance. And others have more than three. I read of a Bantu language
> with the following system (IIRC)
[skip list]
... not to mention some languages also have a "mythological past", for
events so far back in time, no one really knows what to make of them
for sure.
===========================================
Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
AIM: Deuterotom ICQ: 4315704
<http://www.angelfire.com/tx/eclectorium/>
"Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."
"Things just ain't the way they used to was."
- a man on the subway
===========================================