Re: English notation
From: | Christian Thalmann <cinga@...> |
Date: | Friday, June 29, 2001, 20:52 |
John Cowan wrote:
> This is in essence the philosophy of Regularized Inglish: search the
> archives for that phrase for my previous postings on it. The principle
> of RI is, for each letter/digraph/trigraph/tetragraph
> representing a given range of pronunciations, to choose a few
> common ones (ideally one) to retain, and change all the words that have
> different pronunciations. Thus "ea" only as in "heal"; "bread" becomes
> "bred", and "great" becomes "grait". It makes reading easy, though
> writing is only somewhat easier than at present: you still have to
> remember "strait" vs. "straight". After all, we do far more reading
> than writing.
This is by far the most realistic model of an English spelling reform so
far. Congrats. As for searching the archives: Isn't the Yahoo!Group
archive defunct?
-- Christian Thalmann
Reply