Re: USAGE: 'born'
From: | Muke Tever <alrivera@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 9, 2001, 22:57 |
From: "Nik Taylor" <fortytwo@...>
> Tommie L Powell wrote:
> > > "...the city is still becoming. There may be arguments
> > > as to what it's becoming, but no one can reasonably
> > > doubt that the place is still giving birth to itself."
> >
> > Hmmm. Let's look at that first quoted sentence first:
> > "...the city is still becoming." Since there's no object,
> > what we have here is either an intransitive verb that
> > isn't in my dictionary, or else a copula ("is") plus an
> > adjective ("becoming"). As an adjective, "becoming"
> > means attractive, so the sentence then means that the
> > city hasn't yet lost its attractiveness.
>
> "Becoming" means "attractive"?
Yup. "Pleasing or attractive to the eye." (AHD4) (cf. "comely"?)
So it may be one of those nasty puns. <The city's still becoming[=attractive],
but whatever it's becoming[=changing into]..> But one would need the context of
the phrase immediately before it for a certain prognosis.
*Muke!