Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: Verb voice

From:Raymond A. Brown <raybrown@...>
Date:Tuesday, May 4, 1999, 14:12
At 12:35 pm -0700 3/5/99, JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON wrote:
>On Mon, 3 May 1999, R. Nierse wrote: > >> I don''t know for sure if the example I've encountered really is a voice.=
I
>> haven't found it in other natlangs or conlangs, it is called 'Non-control=
'
>> and I found in Sechelt (Salishan): >> k0u-St-la-waL-L@m-n@x-am 'now we have forgotten it (and there was nothin=
g
>> we could do about it)'. >> IRR-1PL-now-forget-NON_CNTRL-1PL >> >> The -n@x- indicates that the actor has no control over the action. I was >> very much intrigued by this suffix at the time I studied the language. Ar=
e
>> there any others that have examples of 'non-control'? > >I wouldn't call this a "voice" in the traditional sense - viz. morphology >on the verb which indicates a manipulation of the mapping between >argument structure or semantic roles (agent, patient) and surface >grammatical relations (subject, object; nominative, absolutive; etc.).
That's a pretty neat & useful definition of "voice" :)
>But it's certainly an interesting phenomenon.
I agree and certainly both in your definition and in other 'traditional' definitions of voice, this is not a distinction of voice. I wonder at first if this were an aspectual difference; but this deals with ideas like completed or incompleted, habitual, iterative or frequentative, inchoative or inceptive actions/states etc. Non-control is different since, I guess, any of these aspects may be encountered whether the subject has control over the action or not. Et dans un courrier dat=E9 3/5/99 Mathias a =E9crit ::
>Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 03/05/99 08:21:37 , vous avez =E9crit :
[....]
>There are lots of items that may be stuck (in)to voices like control, >volition, etc., regarless it's already implied in the meaning of the verb.
Ah, now 'volition' immediately suggests _modality_ to me, i.e. a different "mood". Modal distinctions, whether made inflexionally or, as in English, with modal auxiliaries, cover a wide range of meanings, especially attitudes on the part of the speaker/writer towards the factual content of what is uttered or written, e.g. uncertainty, factuality, possibility, necessity etc. It would seem to me that is 'non-control' a modal attribute of the verb. Ray.