Re: Rating Languages
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Saturday, September 29, 2001, 0:12 |
David Peterson wrote:
> But...it was "be living" in the question, and it didn't phase me at all:
> "Where are you living?" It seems to me that the distinction is this:
>
> a.) "Where are you living (now)?" The person knows you well and hasn't seen
> you in awhile and knows you have moved.
> b.) "Where do you live?" The person can never have been to your house
> before, unless they've only been once and they forgot, in which case the
> question would be, "Where do you live again?"
Right, but what I mean is I'd say either "I'm living in Miami now" or "I
live in Miami now", both would be proper responses to that question,
but, in the context of the situation you gave, "Where do you live now?"
would sound odd. "Where do you live?" would require a different context
than "Where are you living?", but "I'm living in Miami" and "I live in
Miami" would both work in the same context, in my idiolect.
--
"No just cause can be advanced by terror"
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42