Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT: The Geography Of A Discworld and the surrounding universe.

From:Peter Clark <peter-clark@...>
Date:Thursday, August 8, 2002, 16:20
On Thursday 08 August 2002 17:44, Joe wrote:
> No, I mean a giant disk in space with a small ball of flaming gas orbiting > it. I'm trying to avoid saying how it came into being, I'm just describing > how it is.
Ok, setting aside questions of *how* such a structure could naturally occur, there are several more questions that need answering. 1. How thick is the disk? Unless it is massively thick, a strong gravitational pull will be nearly non-existant. I haven't done the math, but I'm guessing that it would have to be at least 20k kilometers thick in order for there to be any meaningful gravitational pull. Gravity is very important; if it's not strong enough, any atmosphere will just drift off into space, along with any inhabitants. Little children would have to be extremely careful, lest with one bounce they go flying into space. As for the notion of a gravitational center of the universe--it's pointless. The pull of gravity decreases exponentially with distance. At a large scale, gravity works only on large bodies--stars circling the galactic center, for instance--not on small objects. 2. How wide is the disk? I assume that we are talking about some very large structure, but there are some serious concerns to its stability. For one, a disk is a most unusual object in space. There's a reason why large bodies in space are round. If you have a small star orbiting it, that's going to cause gravitational distortion; if the disk is too small, it will gradually become more sphere-like; if the disk is too large, eventually it will disintergrate because of the stress. With our current understanding of physics, a discworld simply cannot be. One could build a disk, but without some means of "roofing" it to keep the atmosphere in and providing some form of artificial gravity, it could not support land-based life. Such a world would be more fantasy, á la Terry Pratchett, rather than vaguely plausible, á la David Niven. (Although even a Ringworld would be unstable without the use of some sort of auto-correcting propulsion system.) :Peter

Reply

Joe <joe@...>