Re: Part-of-Speech Analysis Problem
From: | taliesin the storyteller <taliesin-conlang@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 14, 2007, 12:09 |
* Joseph Fatula said on 2007-03-14 13:27:56 +0100
> This is going to sound really dumb. I have a conlang I'm working on,
> and I understand how the grammar works (I think), but I'm having
> problems figuring out which parts of speech various words are. Here are
> some really simple sentences in this conlang.*
>
> - Com Jan alma ave. "John eats an apple."
> - Com Jan almar avest. "John ate some apples."
> - Com Jan alma navest. "John didn't eat an apple."
VSO
Jan = John
zeyel = deer
sagin = hunt/hunter
com = eat/eater
ved = see
n(e)- = not
-um = object, to disambiguate
-(i)r = plural
The tricky bits is ave (article?), cad (article?), hat and bay
(pronouns?)
Can ave, cad, bay and hat be used in the verb-position?
What about Jan and zeyel?
To have a null-derivation between verb and subject of verb isn't that
outrageous, likely an anadew even.
/snippage/
> - Ved com hat. "The eater sees the food."
> - Ved sagin hat. "The hunter sees the prey."
> - Com bay. "The eater eats the food."
> - Sagin bay. "The hunter hunts the prey."
> - Sagin nebayest. "The hunter didn't hunt the prey."
hat is default object for a verb, and not very affected by that verb?
bay is default object for a verb, but is very much affected by the verb?
I'd call these pronouns. Quite a neat system.
> Any ideas?
Were mine useful?
t.