Re: Part-of-Speech Analysis Problem
From: | Wayne Chevrier <wayne.chevrier@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 14, 2007, 21:04 |
On 14/03/07, Christian Thalmann <cinga@...> wrote:
>
> I don't understand the difference between "ave" and "cad". They
> seem to be mere auxiliaries intended to carry suffixes. I thought
> it had something to do with definiteness of the object, or with
> the use of the -um suffix, but I can't see a consistency. Some
> help?
>
> Hat and bay just seem to mean "canonical object" and "canonical
> subject/object combination".
>
>
> -- Christian Thalmann
>
It looks to me that ave=a(n), avest= some, navest=none, cad=the, necad=not
the
also -um=animate object, -us=subject which is non-topic
--
--Wayne Chevrier