From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 21:31 |
Hi! Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> writes:> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:23:47 -0500, Henrik Theiling >... > In normal terms, yeah. The page talks of an *exclusive* or, though, or > an XOR in jargon -- explicitly not an inclusive OR. I used OR for XOR > since that was the terminology on the page, and defined inclusive OR > in those terms.Ah, ok. Then using OR for XOR is confusing. :-) **Henrik