> Hi!
>
> Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> writes:
>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:16:19 -0500, Jefferson Wilson
>> <jeffwilson63@...> wrote:
>>
>> > Just wondering if anyone has looked at my Glyphica Arcana page at
>> >
http://www.meanspc.com/~jeff_wilson63/myths/BabelTarot.html
>> >
>> > I haven't received any feedback from this list and comments are
>> > definitely appreciated.
>>
>> Do you have an inclusive OR as well as an exlusive OR, i.e. a marker for
>>
>> (A AND B) OR (A OR B)
>
> That's quite redundant and could be reduced to a simple (A OR B).
> I'm sure you mean the following instead:
In normal terms, yeah. The page talks of an *exclusive* or, though, or an
XOR in jargon -- explicitly not an inclusive OR. I used OR for XOR since
that was the terminology on the page, and defined inclusive OR in those
terms.
Paul