From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 13:23 |
Hi! Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> writes:> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:16:19 -0500, Jefferson Wilson > <jeffwilson63@...> wrote: > > > Just wondering if anyone has looked at my Glyphica Arcana page at > > http://www.meanspc.com/~jeff_wilson63/myths/BabelTarot.html > > > > I haven't received any feedback from this list and comments are > > definitely appreciated. > > Do you have an inclusive OR as well as an exlusive OR, i.e. a marker for > > (A AND B) OR (A OR B)That's quite redundant and could be reduced to a simple (A OR B). I'm sure you mean the following instead: A B (NOT (A AND B)) AND (A OR B) 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0> Do you have a lighter, or some matches?Indeed, it is a typical (lame :-)) joke by first semester computer science students to answer 'yes' to a question like: 'Will you eat at the cafeteria or did you bring something yourself?'. I think my Tyl Sjok is worst in this respect: it only has one coordination particle. If used without anything else, it only indicates that no subordination/modification happens and that the two linked constituents are equally coordinated. It may mean 'and' as well as 'or', 'xor', whatever. For clarifying the meaning, you need additional words. :-) **Henrik
Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> | AND and OR (was Re: Glyphica Arcana Page) |
Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> |