Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Christophe Grandsire wrote:

> En réponse à Costentin Cornomorus :
>
>
> >Well, how am I supposed to know! We've never met!
> >;)
>
> Well, you could have seen my photo on YUM (or on my webpage). Those would
> have made clear that I'm not a silicon being :)) .
Yes, but who's to say you are who you say you are? You might really be a
troll _pretending_ to be a human, stealing someone elses' identity!

> >Well, what do yóu think we live on? Some ball of
> >rock floating in space!? Ludicrous!!!!!!!
>
> Well, my experience on this world says that it is ludicrous already anyway
> ;)) . So yes! :))
:)

> >On the other hand, you may be right in calling
> >them "crazy" - pica, the eating of non-nutritive
> >substances is in the DSM-iv.
>
> If pica is defined as "the eating of non-nutritive substances"
If you care enough, I have to borrow the DSM-IV tomorrow anyway :) (Well,
don't have to, but it might help with a paper I'm writing).

> (funny, I've always thought it meant "12 points" ;))))) ),
That's what I thought to :)

> then I can tell that most people in the developed countries indulge in
> it! Just have a look at the ingredients of most things you find in
> supermarkets ;)))))))
Heh :) But I reckon there's probably always something at least remotely
nutritive :) (Take a look at the nutritional info on a bottle of water,
though: everything except the sodium is 0. Why you'd buy bottled water
(here at least---the tap water is often of a better quality, and gives
you free fluoride to boot!), I don't know, though...)

--
Tristan                  <kesuari@...>

Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still
be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement.
                -- Snoopy

Replies