Re: OT: Worcestershire sauce
| From: | Tristan McLeay <zsau@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, October 6, 2003, 21:21 |
|---|
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:05:28AM -0400, Tristan McLeay wrote:
> > That's funny. If it hadn't come from Maccas, I'd probably've called it a
> > fish roll, but a sandwich has to be between two slices of bread (here).
>
> Hm. Does the Filet-O-Fish not come on a bun over there? Or is it the
> case that a bun doesn't qualify as "two slices of bread" for sandwich-being
> purposes?
A bun doesn't count as bread, no. And for most usual circumstances, I'd
probably call it a roll (rather than a 'bun' (which to me sounds like it
should be sweet)).
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>
Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still
be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement.
-- Snoopy
Reply