Re: CHAT: Brainstorming! Relative clauses
From: | Padraic Brown <pbrown@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 7, 1999, 23:08 |
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Paul Bennett wrote:
> tal writes:
> >>>>>>
> * Padraic Brown (pbrown@polaris.umuc.edu) [991007 17:33]:
> > It's probably the monetary motivation. Boy, I'd sure like to have a job
> > where I get paid for conlanging! ;D
>
> Humm you DO know that the best way to kill creativity is to be paid to
> be creative?
> <<<<<<
>
> For "paid", read "coerced", IMO, and a truer sentiment was never uttered.
>
I'll go with that, certainly.
Padraic.
>
>
>
>
> *************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
> to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the
> sender. This footnote also confirms that this email message
> has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
> *************************************************************
>