----- Original Message -----
From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: "triggers et al" as I presently understand them
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 06:09:39PM +0200, Rodlox wrote:
>
> > I think the example provided (no, don't remember which post) had
writing,
> > pen, and other related items under a single word, which could be
specified
> > which one by use of a (trigger(?)) word.
>
> Eureka!
>
> The message Rodlox is thinking of is:
>
>
http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0312B&L=conlang&P=R7340
thank you.
> Rodlox, go back and read that again.
I tried . . . and got double vision.
I'll try again soon.
thank you for finding it!!
> I think you completely
> misunderstood it
> (and came up with an even cooler idea,
I posted it here in this group..._C-23...based on our discussions in-list_
> but which is
> not a trigger!)
oh. sorry.
> The trigger never changes the meaning of any of
> the words in Roger's example sentences (see the correct sentences
> in the paragraph beginning with "I think you're ignoring your
> own invented morphology"). I'd be happy to attempt to clarify
> anything that is not making sense to you in that message.
okay.
> On the other hand, just keep your original idea and give it a new name :)
thus far, Polynymic Selectives. bad name? :)