Re: X-SAMPA confusion (sorry)

Henrik Theiling wrote:

>Hi!
>Isaac Penzev <isaacp@...> writes:
>
>
>>Henrik Theiling eskribiw:
>>...
>>
>>
>>>That's infixed.  The problem is the order: ) is after the two sounds,
>>>and _ is in between.  But binary diacritics in Unicode are always in
>>>between, not after the two components.
>>>
>>>Changing the order, one could translate both ) and _ to the same
>>>Unicode.
>>>
>>>
>>If you think about machine conversion, that may be really a problem. But
>>AFAIK, CXS was designed for humans, not for computers. Let it remain like
>>this, IMVHO.
>>
>>
>
>Oh, yes, yes, I will!  I like the ) notation a lot, as it is much
>easier to read and is good for disambiguation.  The reason I stated
>the problem of translation was for pointing out differences with
>X-Sampa.
>
>
But it is perhaps ambiguous.  I might suggest [t)S] - I think it looks
quite good, actually.

Reply