Re: English Changes or what into Conlangs

abrigon wrote:
> Why did
> we get stuck with -es and -s, I think it may have alot to do with those
> who wrote dictionaries back in the 16th Century, who wanted a lingo to
> be more Latin/French looking.
No, what happened was in some places in England the -es forms became
most common, and -en plurals turned into -es (with a few exceptions),
while in others the -en forms won out.  The London dialect happened to
be a -es dialect.  If the capital had been in another place, we'd
probably wear shoen and live in housen.

Also, I wonder, if it first happened in Northern England - did Old Norse
have a preferences for /s/ in plurals?  I wonder if it might've been a
Norse influence that traveled southward, like the verbal -s?

--
"Old linguists never die - they just come to voiceless stops." -
anonymous
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Conlang/W.html
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor