Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Monday, March 10, 2003, 21:23 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sally Caves" <scaves@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Cowan" <jcowan@...>
>
> > You have the terminology swapped.
> >
> > etabnannimous = predictable by rule, but the rules are very complex
> > maggelit(in)ous = not predictable at all.
>
> Hmmm. Okay, I'll take your word for it. I had thought that Etabnannery
> referred exclusively to phonology and scripts, and that Maggelity referred
> to linguistic structure. Where did I get that idea? Do either refer to
> both?
>
Well, Maggel got it's name from it's complex and it's apparently random
orthography. I have to ask Christophe, though, is there an Old Maggel in
which these words actually made sense?
Reply