Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
From: | JS Bangs <jaspax@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 2:12 |
Christian Thalmann sikyal:
> --- In conlang@y..., Kala Tunu <kalatunu@H...> wrote:
>
> > aherm, maybe we shouldn't flame each other for such trivia.
>
> How come everybody who says that in this thread then immediately
> proceeds to flame someone for such trivia? =P
Hence my silence on this thread, despite the fact that I started it, and
that I'm still convinved that Christophe is utterly wrong.
Feh. In my own conlangs I will continue to use |ei| for [e], and continue
to think it correct.
Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu
"If you look at a thing nine hundred and ninety-nine times, you are
perfectly safe; if you look at it the thousandth time, you are in
frightful danger of seeing it for the first time."
--G.K. Chesterton