Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Chinese Dialect Question

From:Estel Telcontar <estel_telcontar@...>
Date:Friday, October 3, 2003, 3:46
 --- Tristan McLeay wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Estel Telcontar wrote: > > > --- Adam Walker ha tera a: > > > And of course Rhotic dialects of English have two > > > rhotics in complementary distribution. > > Actually, no. Many English rhotic dialects of English use the same > consonants in both cases; the principal of my high school did that > (or > rather, he does it but it's not my high school any more). It was > rather > disconcerting, to be honest, as it was an otherwise Southern BrE > accent, > and though his r was in the same style as mine, it had the > distribution of > Americans'. > > (Perhaps it was more disconcerting for me because my dialect in > uncareful > speech is happy enough to drop its schwas, without a change in the r; > [&r\d] would only ever be heard as 'arid' because of this.) > > > Which two rhotics are you talking about? Two different allophones > of > > "r"? > > If we're including allophones, then what about [4], used by many > > dialects for intervocalic "t" and "d"? It's even in complementary > > distribution with "r", I think: > > > > (note: for convenience, I'm going to use [r]/r/ for the English > > approximant "r".) > > > > /bEri/ [bEri] Barry/berry > > /bEti/ [bE4i] Betty (or "beddy", if such a word existed.) > > You seem to be confused about the meaning of 'complementary > distribution'. > It means that one is found only in places that the other isn't, and > they > are allophones of each other.
No, I understand, it was just a slip of the fingers/mind under the influence of the preceding text. I meant contrastive distribution. I meant that, if we're counting rhotics in English, we shouldn't ignore the tap, even if it's an allophone of t/d, not of "r". I didn't mean to say that it was in complementary distribution with another rhotic.
> So AmE [r\] and [4] are *not* in complementary distribution, but (I > think > it's) [r\] and [r\`] are (the latter being found when acting as a > vowel or > when not before a vowel, e.g. in bird, hurry or beard).
So that's the two, eh? [r\], [r\`], [4] ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

Reply

Tristan McLeay <zsau@...>