Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY : reverse clitization

From:Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Saturday, August 23, 2003, 19:47
Quoting Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>:

> Just a terminological question that came up when thinking about the English > and Swedish genitives: > > When a particle becomes a clitic, we speak of "clitization". Would the word > also apply to an affix semidetaching to become a clitic (as these genitive > markers have done), or is there another term for that?
I don't know of a particular word for this; I suspect a newly polysemous "cliticization" would be used.
> While at it, are there terms for a clitic fully detaching to become an > independent word, or attaching fully to become an affix?
For the latter notion, yes: _grammaticalization_. For the former (e.g. the recent development of "ex" for "former spouse"), I don't believe there is a distinct word, but perhaps "degrammaticalization" would do. ========================================================================= Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally, Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of 1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter. Chicago, IL 60637

Replies

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Pavel Iosad <edricson@...>