Re: More on number bases
From: | Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...> |
Date: | Saturday, May 18, 2002, 19:47 |
At 3:04 pm -0500 17/5/02, Danny Wier wrote:
[snip]
>
>The ancient Egyptians used base-8 fractions and base-10 whole numbers, if
>I'm not mistaken.
>
Dunno about that - but the ancient Romans used base-12 fractions and
base-10 whole numbers. The Latin for 1/12 is _uncia_ [u:Nkia] which, by
way of Old English _ynce_, gives us "inch" (1/12 of a foot) and, by way of
Old French _unce_, gives us "ounce" (1/12 of a pound troy* - still used by
gold- and silversmiths when I was young, but now legally obsolete in the
UK).
*named from Troyes in France, not the place inhabited by Trojans of old!
Why the pound avoirdupois assumed 16 ounces, I know not - but 'twas nothing
to do with the Romans :)
Indeed, Latin had special words - all nouns - for all twelve divisions of a
unit. In case anyone might like to imitate them or, indeed, base conlang
forms on them, I give them below:
NOMINATIVE GENITIVE
1/12 u:ncia, u:nciae
2/12 = 1/6 sexta:ns, sextantis
3/13 = 1/4 quadra:ns, quadrantis
4/13 = 1/3 trie:ns, trientis
5/12 qui:ncu:nx, qui:ncu:ncis
6/12 = 1/2 se:mis, se:missis
7/12 septu:nx, septu:ncis
8/12 = 2/3 bes, bessis
9/12 = 3/4 do:dra:ns, do:drantis
10/12 = 5/6 dexta:ns, dextantis
11/12 deu:nx, deu:ncis
All are masculine, except _uncia_ which is feminine.
Just to complete the picture, the word for 'a unit' was _as_ (gen.
_assis_), also masculine.
Ray.
=======================================================
The median nature of language is an epistemological
commonplace. So is the fact that every general
statement worth making about language invites a
counter-statement or antithesis.
GEORGE STEINER.
=======================================================
Replies