Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad

J?rg Rhiemeier scripsit:

> This is part of the problem.  The history is *grossly* inconsistent,
> there are too many things that clash with each other to mention.
Please do mention them, or some of them.  We certainly don't want
inconsistencies, although absolute consistency is not to be expected
in something that is the product of many hands and minds over many
years.

> It is true that my Elves would not make things worse, but I don't
> want to toss them into that bin.
Your choice, of course.

On Padraic:

> Well, that is quite much.  You keep the web site, and
> in a way, you are thus in control what is "canonical"
> in IB.
I assure you, he isn't.  He can and does make mistakes and
gets corrected by me and others.

> It seems to please you that Dragon & Star hasn't made
> substantial progress yet, and your comments seem to
> imply that you take the mere existence of D&S
> as an offence.
I think there's no evidence that he has any such intention.

--
John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British
Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence
of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1.  I doubt if
the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of
equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940

Reply