En réponse à Tristan McLeay :
>Oh yes, I think I had an idea like that for a consketch of mine. I don't
>know what became of it... Though not with that detail about articles.
Hehe, the Maggel article is a pretty strange beast. Its occurence is pretty
much dependent only on the words that appear around the noun, and has a
definite meaning only when the noun is alone :)) .
>(And it's 'Hebrew', pronounced with an (English-style) 'long e'.)
Somehow, this spelling "Hebrew" just looks... wrong to me, which is why I
keep making the mistake.
>Oh, only as insane? :( :)
Yep :)) .
>They all seem quite reasonable to me :)
Of course, to me too :) . But we're not quite common are we? ;)))))
Christophe Grandsire.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.