From: | Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Thursday, September 19, 2002, 12:16 |
--- Christophe wrote:> > >Yes, I have to wonder where I get these ideas from! > > > > What about German im = in dem, am = an dem, vom = von dem, auf's = auf > > das? > > Forgot those ones! IIRC there's also ins=in das, ...And "beim" (< bei dem), "zum" (< zu dem), "zur" (< zu der, the only example I can remember with the female article).> ... and I seem to remember that Old Dutch had them too (but I may be wrong).Yes, "ten" (< te den) and "ter" (< ter der). I wouldn't call that "Old Dutch", though; it would me more appropriate to call it "Pre-WWII Dutch". In 1937 (± one year) the dative endings were abolished, and they survived only in some common expressions. Nowadays those forms are still used, but often improperly, since most people don't know whether a word is masculine or feminine (indeed, you often need a dictionary for that; sometimes German can be helpful).> Still, they are quite rare, and except German and maye Old Dutch I don't know> if other Germanic languages have them.Lëtzebuergësch, if you want to consider it a language, has a lot of them, also in cases where German doesn't. For example "mam" (< mët dem). Jan ===== "Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |