Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode

From:John Vertical <johnvertical@...>
Date:Thursday, January 18, 2007, 14:51
Paul Bennett wrote:
>However, I discovered last night, while rolling these posts around in my >mind, that I can produce a velar trill (though it sounds *horrible*) and >thus a labiovelar trill. Making that into a doubly-articulated flap/tap >might take work, but I think it might be worth it...
Are you sure it's a strictly velar trill, not a velarized uvular trill or some sort of a gargle effect? It's not supposed to be possible to trill the dorsum. Makes me wonder why the IPA still leaves the palatal trill as "possible but not attestested" tho. A _velopharyngeal_ trill does exist, however. (That's where you have the velum as the activ articulator. It sounds like snoring, or snorting maybe.)
>I'm a fan of /v`/ due to the "rhotic" nature of taps & flaps, retroflexes >and rhotaicized vowels. There's a certain graphic >similarity, too. However, this gets religious fairly quickly >(based on past experience), so watch out.
That looks initially good, but not so much after realizing that it's also possible to rhotacize /v/ directly. But that could however maybe be transcribed as a dubbelpronunciation /vr\`)/. CXS doesn't use asterisks for anything, does it? /v*/ might be a suitable ad-hoc transcription too, as I think one of the non-SAMPA ASCII-IPAs employs asterisks for trills more generally, even.
>Anyway, /l\/ seems like an eminent choice (though absent from CXS AFAICT) >for the alveolar lateral flap, which is the "long leg turned r" >in IPA, though in IPA it's IIRC deprecated as "not attested as >distinctive", which only adds to the confusion. Still, CXS is concerned >with attestation in conlangs at least as much as natlangs.
As well as phoneTic transcription.
>Regardless, it still leaves the question open for the fricative set. The >/_0/ diactritic seems like a decent option, but it's nonsatisfactory >(to me) in the long term).
>Paul
I should maybe mention that Z-SAMPA has all sorts of symbols for lateral fricativs. Listing in voiced/voiceless pairs; POAs rfx-pal-vel-uv: /K\` K` 6\ C\ V\ F\ Q\ q\/ ....and then there's canIPA, which has diacritic-less (or at least floating-diacritic-less) symbols for just about every possible sound. It uses versions of the belted lateral symbols with the belt reversed for voiced frics. I have no idea how he's implemented the symbols, however. John Vertical _________________________________________________________________ Uutisista turhaan tietoon. Mitä ikinä etsitkin, MSN Search löytää hakemasi. http://search.msn.fi

Reply

Eric Christopherson <rakko@...>