Re: Second report on Koni'
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 27, 2003, 10:37 |
En réponse à Isaac Penzev <isaacp@...>:
>
> Good. At least it means that my ears do not betray me :-))
>
Or our sets of ears betray us in the same way ;)) .
> >
> > Could Ukranian /v/ be actually [v\] (labiodental approximant)? Or is
> it
> > definitely fricative?
>
> Good idea. But on the other hand, I slightly doubt if it is labiodental.
> It
> sounds (and looks) more like smth bilabial. Having looked at the
> thread
> about Czech r^, I found an opportunity to describe it as "voiced
> bilabial
> approximant" [B_o] - "lowered beta".
Hehe, that was to be my second proposal :)) .
Ugh, pronunciation threads become
> dangerous...
>
As long as they are not *English* pronunciation threads, everything's OK ;)) .
And it probably gives ideas to many conlangers (I know it does to me. I've just
realised that Maggel's palatalised [r] is most probably pronounced like Czech
r^ ;))) ).
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
It takes a straight mind to create a twisted conlang.