Re: Allophones Question
From: | Angel Rivera <mktvr@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, February 18, 2003, 16:05 |
From: "Nik Taylor" <yonjuuni@...>
> Christophe Grandsire wrote:
> > Not really. Castillian Spanish has neither /D/ nor /G/. It has [D] and
> > [G] as allophones respectively of /d/ and /g/ between vowels, but not
> > as phonemes.
>
> [d] and [g] could be said to be allophones of /D/ and /G/, as [d] is
> only used word-initially, or after /n/ or /l/, while /G/ is only used
> word-initially or after /n/. The fricative pronunciations are more
> common than the stop, thus /D/ and /G/ could very well be called the
> basic phoneme. Ultimately, it's just a matter of labeling.
I'm readin Pike's _Phonemics_ lately [looks old, but like the only text on it my
library has], and apparently:
<< It is advisable to consider as the norm that segment which has the least
limitation in distribution in the language, and appears to be the least affected
by surrounding sounds. >>
...which is why I considered it safe to use the Spanish example.
*Muke!
--
http://www.frath.net/
Reply