Re: Tho (was: Blandness (was: Uusisuom's influences))
From: | Yoon Ha Lee <yl112@...> |
Date: | Monday, April 16, 2001, 16:47 |
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Patrick Dunn wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, David Peterson wrote:
>
> > Actually, I think my main point (which, for some reason, I didn't state) is
> > that often times I have no clue what's being said. I don't want to have to
> > keep a hand dictionary of your accepted acronyms just to understand an e-mail.
>
> It's called learning the discourse of the community. The online community
> has a discourse. Learn it, or don't. It doesn't matter.
>
> > things like "don't" or "i'm" when I do)>>
> >
> > Well, of course you wouldn't use "I'm"--you're not supposed to use personal
> > pronouns in formal paper writing. :)
>
> Have you read any academic papers written in the last ten years? That
> prohibition is long dead.
And as far as I can tell it's been violated for a *long* time in
scientific papers, and maybe math too.
YHL
Reply