Re: Tho (was: Blandness (was: Uusisuom's influences))
From: | Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Monday, April 16, 2001, 16:08 |
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, David Peterson wrote:
> In a message dated 4/15/01 9:23:45 PM, Barry_Garcia@MONTEREY.EDU writes:
>
> << Why should it bother you (david peterson) so much if you can
>
> understand what's being said? >>
>
> Actually, I think my main point (which, for some reason, I didn't state) is
> that often times I have no clue what's being said. I don't want to have to
> keep a hand dictionary of your accepted acronyms just to understand an e-mail.
It's called learning the discourse of the community. The online community
has a discourse. Learn it, or don't. It doesn't matter.
> things like "don't" or "i'm" when I do)>>
>
> Well, of course you wouldn't use "I'm"--you're not supposed to use personal
> pronouns in formal paper writing. :)
Have you read any academic papers written in the last ten years? That
prohibition is long dead.
--Pat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Living your life is a task so difficult,
it has never been attempted before.
Reply