Re: OT: art and language and THE DAVINCI CODE
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Monday, June 2, 2003, 21:23 |
Andreas Johansson wrote at 2003-06-02 23:00:35 (+0200)
> Quoting "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...>:
>
> > Similarly, to this day I don't understand all the fuss over "The
> > Matrix". Great visual effects, impressive action sequences,
> > laughably silly premise, passable acting and writing - enjoyable,
> > but hardly "the thinking person's science fiction movie", as I
> > heard it touted repeatedly.
>
> The Matrix may very possibly have the worst plot of any movie I've
> seen. "The thinking person's SF movie"? Armagedon (sp?) makes more
> sense ...
>
I don't agree to that. It's certainly not "The thinking person's
science fiction movie", but it does contain a lot of references to
various questions of philosophy. Maybe "The not-particularly-thinking
person who would nonetheless enjoy a palatable introduction to certain
deep thoughts's blockbuster action movie".
Really, I'd have quite liked it if they'd just understood that humans
are not net energy sources.
Replies