Re: Droppin' Ds

CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU writes:
>It depends what you want, and only you can decide.  If you just want a
>"fun
>language" made up indiscrimately of bits & pieces of different Romance
>langs, then it doesn't matter a great deal what you do.  But tho the
>result
>may be fun, do not expect it to look like (or sound like) a 'natural'
>Romance lang.  If you want to derive a plausible 'alternate' Romancelang
>then you have to use consistent 'rules' based on those actually attested.
>
>Ray.
Thanks Ray. I'm still not decided if I want to go with it being a
plausible natural one (i did have an understanding that au for instance
changes in all positions, and c before front vowels is the same in any
position as well), or if I want it to be more of a fun language. Maybe
i'll go with fun, who knows ;). Of course, I might have to build a country
for the speakers, but well.......not sure where the heck they'd go......