Re: Alborgian/ Borgi

Danke schön, Carsten
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carsten Becker" <carbeck@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: Alborgian/ Borgi


> And again in Unicode with the text not being dissolved into HTML entities:
>
> Ingmar Roerdinkholder wrote:
>
>> [wэ nar mэ′si wu′λεðu kał nэ ′laβuðu pα′pa эn hεb (эm) mэ′si
>> fэ ′lałm kwir šœft ′jåwα ′baśtα dэł ′blenα zα′irα ′dεvα эn
>> ′śwalэk α′telił dэ′neri u α′žewś ′laβu žэ′wab žu′wã ′εntα
>> lu′λεðił čar ′hεlu ′jεl:αł ′śwalэk meś fasэl:i α′leś la pα′pa
>> laŋ kar ′figα u′ne]
>>
>> South Eastern rural pronunciation (more conservative,
>> arabic like):
>>
>> [wэ na:r mэ′si:ђ wэђu′liэd ka:ł nэla′βu:ðu pa′pa эn
>> ђεb:эm:э′si: fэ ′la:lэm kэ′vi:r šœft ′jεwa ′basta dэl
>> ′ble:na zэ′εjra ′de:βa эn su′walэk a′te:li d:э′ne:ri u a′džews
>> la′βu: džu′wab džu′wan ′εnta lu′liэðil ča:r ′hεlu ′jεl:a
>> s:u′walэk ′mεjsi ′fasэl:i α:′le:s la pa′pa la:ŋ ga′ðar ′fi:ga
>> une:]
>
> å, ś, š, ž etc. are no IPA symbols, though, so there may have been some
> more errors that happened due to the conversion.
>
> Regards
> Carsten
>
> --
> Pinena, Lahang 3, 2317 ya 15:07:24 pd
> Friday, May 23, 2008 at 09:21:36 pm
>