Re: CHAT: Orange
From: | Christopher B Wright <faceloran@...> |
Date: | Monday, June 10, 2002, 14:00 |
Christophe Grandsire sekalge:
>But for me light red is light red, not pink :)) . The two don't look
alike at
>all. Also, you can lighten and darken pink too, and dark pink absolutely
>doesn't look like red, or what I would call red (it is more browny,
though not
>really brown).
Pink is made using red and white pigments. (What a depressingly ugly
word.) If you add black pigments, you get not a shade of red, but a tone.
Add the right grey to red, and you'll get the same result as darkened
pink.
Now, if you're talking about light, you're correct. Pink light would be
every colour of light, with red foremost.
>You can go continuously from dark blue to light blue simply
>by lightening it up.
No, for the same reason as above. You'd have to remove the black and then
add white. Alternately, you could shift the wavelength from indigo or
near indigo toward green. You still would not have a light blue like "sky
blue" unless you added colours from the rest of the spectrum.
Aleks sekalge:
>...Still though, I have NEVER heard of a colour called "lilac"
They meant "the colour of most lilacs", which would be a sort of pale
purple fuschia wossname.
Laimes.
The Anglicising
Wright.