Re: Terkunan revision
|From:||Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>|
|Date:||Monday, October 8, 2007, 13:16|
On 10/8/07, Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> wrote:
> The last one was particularly confusing I think. Now that _il_
> has become _le_, it can obviously not be prefixed anymore because
> _le kan_ is already occupied. So there is now an exception that
> the 3rd persion pronoun cannot be prefixed and the normal
> suffixed possessive with _de_ must be used:
> kan de le - his/her dog
> Although an exception, is seems very reasonable to me.
Indeed; it seems to me like a natural result had the two merged
through, say, regular sound change.
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>