Ktabbe H. S. Teoh:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Isaac Penzev wrote:
> > K'tabbe H. S. Teoh:
> >
> > > Well, it may be consistent, but I don't find it nice-looking at all! :-)
> >
> > De gustibus... But I still like it. The only problem for me is with _0_. I
> > would imagine smth like _8_ in its stead...
>
> No, I don't like _8_... _8_ would probably be better used for what is
> currently _w_ (since it is after all pronounced [8]). If only ASCII had an
> o-slash, that would be perfect...
OK. Let's try _Q_. At least it's more contrastive to _o_ than _0_ is.
> > Surely I meant alternative IPA symbols. Under what conditions those
> > different allophones are realized?
> [snip]
>
> It depends... I haven't really sat down to work out the intricacies of
> Ebisedian phonetic realizations yet.
> [skip]
>
> Also, /w/ is sometimes realized as [w@\] instead of [8].
OIC. It's not yet formalized. Ok. Let's be waiting...
Yitzik