Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: German+Hungarian question

From:Ingmar Roerdinkholder <ingmar.roerdinkholder@...>
Date:Saturday, September 3, 2005, 7:07
Hi too!

"Ringeles" (Ringel-S) is Dutch? It's the term we learned at German class
at secondary school, and pronounced as if it were German...

But Henrik, what dialect do you speak? I assumed you spoke Low Saxon, like
me, but that's a language of course. Or do you mean one of the LS dialects?

In the LS of my native town, Wenters (Dutch Winterswijk) in the Guelders
(Gelderland) Ächterhook (Dutch Achterhoek), <krigste> ["krIxst@) etc also
has a short [I], while <kriegen> to get = ["kri:g=N] or ["kri:G@n].
In Dutch, <krijgt> [krEixt] and <krijgen> ["krEiG@].

I'm still curious about Hungarian...

Ingmar



On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 02:55:36 +0200, Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
wrote:

>Hi! > >Ingmar Roerdinkholder <ingmar.roerdinkholder@...> writes: >> I thought that in the new, much hated German Rechtschreibung Ringeles >> "ß" also had to be written "ss". > >Ringeles? Is that the Dutch term for it? I seem to vaguely remember >so. > >Anyway, no, it's only consistently <ß> after long vowel (and >diphthong) and <ss> after short vowel now. So <ß> is still in use >except in Switzerland where it also wasn't used before (dunno why). >By the old rule, <ß> was additionally always used in the ending >consonant cluster of syllables: > > old new pronunciation syllables > naß nass [nas] > paßt passt [p_hast] /'p_hast/ > paßte passte ['p_hast@] /'p_has.t@/ > passe passe ['p_has@] /'p_ha.s@/ > Maß Maß [ma:s] > Maße Maße ['ma:s@] > Masse Masse ['mas@] > >I don't particularly like the new rule since the previous rule >accounted for dialectal differences, too. E.g. > > old new > Spaß Spaß -> people have obviously assumed it is [Spa:s] while > in fact in some dialects (e.g. mine) it is [Spas] > and would have to be written *'Spass' in the new > spelling in some dialects. So the new spelling > is wrong in my dialect. > >BTW the plural is: > Späße Späße -> consistently long in the dialects in question and > in standard language: ['SpE:s@] > >Anyway, this disliking is not very logical :-), since most dialects >are a bit off the standard anyway... E.g. I pronounce 'kriegst' >(standard: [kRi:kst]) as [kRIst], which would have to be written >*'krist' or even *'krißt'. Oh, errrm, *'krisst', of course. :-) > >([kRICst] is also quite common, BTW.) > >**Henrik >=========================================================================

Replies

Stephen Mulraney <ataltane.conlang@...>
Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>