Re: OT: art and language and THE DAVINCI CODE
From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, June 3, 2003, 12:26 |
BP Jonsson scripsit:
> Same problem with Brave-
> heart: if they bothered to make a point that Wallace spoke French and
> Latin, why not use actual Middle French, along with Middle English and
> Middle Scots? And besides the English nobles ought to have been
> speaking Middle French too. I actually lectured our kids on this
> while we were watching the movie!
Then the *whole* movie would have to be subtitled, and the American
audience would jib violently at that. I kept having two different
reactions: 1) What a crock! 2) What a movie! I found this on a
Web site afterwards (paraphrased): How would an American audience have
reacted to a film about the American Revolution that portrayed George
Washington as a simple farmer, rather than a plantation owner, who went
into battle in a fancy Indian outfit, with feathers and wampum belt;
Thomas Jefferson as a weak-willed wimp totally under the thumb of an
older relative who was in fact dead at the time, and culminating with
a scene of Washington having sex with the future Queen Victoria?
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com http://www.reutershealth.com
"Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do, all you will have
to do will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done."
"Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking you to do
anything, you can put the telegram down as a forgery."
Reply